From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:36:30 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH - RFC] env_nand.c: fail gracefully if no nand is present In-Reply-To: <1281994238.2052.37.camel@quadra> References: <1281994238.2052.37.camel@quadra> Message-ID: <4C69AF5E.2090608@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 08/16/2010 04:30 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote: > Rationale: > > The upcoming Beagle xM, unlike previous Beagles, has no on-board NAND. > > I'd like to continue to have a single version of u-boot that works for > all version of Beagles. Therefore I need to have env_nand fail > gracefully when it runs on the xM. > > The patch below does the job, but I am not sure that my method of > checking for the existence of nand (nand_info[0].type = 0 when no nand > detected) is "correct"? Any opinions or advice? I just applied Mike's patch for this a few days ago: http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-nand-flash.git;a=commitdiff;h=962ad59e25640e586e2bceabf67a628a27f8f508 -Scott > > Steve > > --- > > diff --git a/common/env_nand.c b/common/env_nand.c > index a15a950..325f112 100644 > --- a/common/env_nand.c > +++ b/common/env_nand.c > @@ -268,6 +268,10 @@ int readenv (size_t offset, u_char * buf) > > u_char *char_ptr; > > + /* fail if no nand detected */ > + if (nand_info[0].type == 0) > + return 1; > + > blocksize = nand_info[0].erasesize; > len = min(blocksize, CONFIG_ENV_SIZE); > > > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot at lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot >