* [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY
@ 2010-08-19 17:28 Fabio Estevam
2010-08-20 8:31 ` Stefano Babic
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2010-08-19 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY (LAN8700) on the MX51EVK.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
---
board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c b/board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c
index 75d642b..70cce55 100644
--- a/board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c
+++ b/board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c
@@ -261,6 +261,10 @@ static void power_init(void)
/* Reset the ethernet controller over GPIO */
writel(0x1, IOMUXC_BASE_ADDR + 0x0AC);
+ udelay(200);
+ reg = readl(GPIO2_BASE_ADDR + 0x0);
+ reg |= 0x4000; /* Set reset line to high*/
+ writel(reg, GPIO2_BASE_ADDR + 0x0);
/* Enable VGEN3, VCAM, VAUDIO, VVIDEO, VSD regulators */
val = VGEN3EN | VGEN3CONFIG | VCAMEN | VCAMCONFIG |
--
1.6.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY
2010-08-19 17:28 [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY Fabio Estevam
@ 2010-08-20 8:31 ` Stefano Babic
2010-08-20 14:26 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Babic @ 2010-08-20 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY (LAN8700) on the MX51EVK.
>
Hi Fabio,
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> ---
> board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c b/board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c
> index 75d642b..70cce55 100644
> --- a/board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c
> +++ b/board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c
> @@ -261,6 +261,10 @@ static void power_init(void)
>
> /* Reset the ethernet controller over GPIO */
> writel(0x1, IOMUXC_BASE_ADDR + 0x0AC);
> + udelay(200);
> + reg = readl(GPIO2_BASE_ADDR + 0x0);
> + reg |= 0x4000; /* Set reset line to high*/
> + writel(reg, GPIO2_BASE_ADDR + 0x0);
I know I am responsible for this usage, because I forget to add some
accessors for the gpio pins - as I see your patch, I have sent a patch
to support it. However, a direct access to registers using offsets is
not allowed in u-boot. If we use some kind of accessors, your code will
be easier to read it. Everything could be changed as (0X4000 --> gpio
46, if I am not wrong):
udelay(200);
mxc_gpio_set(46);
What do you think ?
Best regards,
Stefano
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY
2010-08-20 8:31 ` Stefano Babic
@ 2010-08-20 14:26 ` Fabio Estevam
2010-08-20 14:39 ` Stefano Babic
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2010-08-20 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Stefano,
--- On Fri, 8/20/10, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote:
...
>
> I know I am responsible for this usage, because I forget to
> add some
> accessors for the gpio pins - as I see your patch, I have
> sent a patch
> to support it. However, a direct access to registers using
> offsets is
> not allowed in u-boot. If we use some kind of accessors,
> your code will
> be easier to read it. Everything could be changed as
> (0X4000 --> gpio
> 46, if I am not wrong):
>
> ??? udelay(200);
> ??? mxc_gpio_set(46);
>
> What do you think ?
Yes, I agree. Do you plan to send a patch for mx51evk using this approach?
If you do, then I can re-submit my patch after your update.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY
2010-08-20 14:26 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2010-08-20 14:39 ` Stefano Babic
2010-08-20 15:33 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Babic @ 2010-08-20 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
Hi Fabio,
>> udelay(200);
>> mxc_gpio_set(46);
This must be,
>>
>> What do you think ?
>
> Yes, I agree. Do you plan to send a patch for mx51evk using this approach?
>
> If you do, then I can re-submit my patch after your update.
I sent today a patch adding a common way to access gpios for i.MX31 and
i.MX51:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/83163
I have another issue. It seems to me that the lines you want to add are
already in the code, only some lines later:
263 /* Enable VGEN3, VCAM, VAUDIO, VVIDEO, VSD regulators */
264 val = VGEN3EN | VGEN3CONFIG | VCAMEN | VCAMCONFIG |
265 VVIDEOEN | VAUDIOEN | VSDEN;
266 pmic_reg_write(REG_MODE_1, val);
267
268 udelay(500);
269
270 reg = readl(GPIO2_BASE_ADDR + 0x0);
271 reg |= 0x4000;
272 writel(reg, GPIO2_BASE_ADDR + 0x0);
This is exactly what you want to add, only after setting the regulators.
Why do we need to set the gpio twice ?
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY
2010-08-20 14:39 ` Stefano Babic
@ 2010-08-20 15:33 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2010-08-20 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
--- On Fri, 8/20/10, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote:
...
>
> This is exactly what you want to add, only after setting
> the regulators.
> Why do we need to set the gpio twice ?
You are right. Please disregard my patch.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-20 15:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-19 17:28 [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY Fabio Estevam
2010-08-20 8:31 ` Stefano Babic
2010-08-20 14:26 ` Fabio Estevam
2010-08-20 14:39 ` Stefano Babic
2010-08-20 15:33 ` Fabio Estevam
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox