From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MTD/SPI/FLASH: add support for Ramtron FRAMs using SPI
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:00:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C76C7F2.3020005@emk-elektronik.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201008260511.17530.vapier@gentoo.org>
Dear Mike,
I have been looking at the possible solutions quite some time now,
the issue is rather complex:
1. according to Ramtron, 0x7f is a continuation byte defined in a
JEDEC standard (I could not find a spec for that), and shall be
ignored until a non-0x7f shows. That shall be Manufacturer Id (0xc2
for Ramtron), followed by the 2 device id bytes. Following that
method, the spi_flash.c should do that and use the first non-0x7f
value for the switch statement. The switch would then have a
case 0xc2 to call the ramtron-specific code.
about like (rough sketch):
for (index=0; index < IDLENGTH-3 && idcode[index] == 0x7f; index++)
;
/*
* here we are on the first non-0x7f byte or still on one,
* the switch will sort that out...
*/
switch (idcode[index]) {
case 0xc2: flash = spi_fram_probe_ramtron(spi, idcode+index);
/* the function will only access its parameter idcode with index 1 and 2 */
etc...
default: /* covers the 0x7f case as well */
2. the switch case 0xff would occur twice, if someone had defined
STMICRO and RAMTRON. I would postulate here that it is not allowed
to define both and issue an #error.
3. If someone decided to put the env into FRAM, the env-var describing
the nonstandard type would not be there (yet). So this should have
another solution. Since because of 2. another non-standard SPI device
should not be expected - I would, after accessing the status register to
verify something FRAM-like is there, use a CONFIG_FRAM_DEVICE to
define the chip to be assumed. That would work for us, since there
is only one non-standard FRAM in the list anyway.
Your thoughts?
Best Regards
Reinhard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-26 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-25 12:47 [U-Boot] [PATCH] MTD/SPI/FLASH: add support for Ramtron FRAMs using SPI Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-26 2:31 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-26 5:57 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-26 6:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-26 6:24 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-26 8:27 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-26 9:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-26 20:00 ` Reinhard Meyer [this message]
2010-08-28 21:48 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-28 22:15 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-28 22:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-28 23:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-28 23:45 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-29 0:14 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-29 1:59 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-29 2:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-29 3:35 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-29 4:34 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-29 4:52 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-09-07 20:12 ` Peter Tyser
2010-09-07 19:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C76C7F2.3020005@emk-elektronik.de \
--to=u-boot@emk-elektronik.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox