From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] IDE: Don't assume there are always two devices per bus
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:15:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C8521A8.6050107@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100906125039.26BDBB7164@gemini.denx.de>
Le 06/09/2010 14:50, Wolfgang Denk a ?crit :
>> 2) as for ide_bus_offset[] and ide_dev_desc[], and any other existing
>> array based on CONFIG_SYS_IDE_MAXBUS or CONFIG_SYS_IDE_MAXDEVICE, they
>> are not going to grow any bigger with my proposal since neither config
>> option will increase.
>
> We might chnage this to dynamically allocated structures. maybe that
> would make more sense then?
I don't see much benefit in allocating dynamically rather than
statically unless you are really tight on RAM, which seems to not fit
with a board which has many busses and disks.
Plus, IDE may not know about hotplugging, but SATA does, which means I
can do an ide_init(), plug or unplug disks, and do an ide_init() again
with a different number of devices. Dynamic allocation requires resizing
the allocated arrays; static is just less trouble.
Anyway, static vs dynamic can be done in a second step after adding N
busses (and thereby fixing the issue of ghost devices that prompted
Rogan's patch proposal).
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-06 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-14 10:41 [U-Boot] IDE_BUS unconditionally expects 2 devices per bus Rogan Dawes
2010-08-14 10:46 ` Rogan Dawes
2010-08-14 11:45 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-08-15 20:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] IDE: Don't assume there are always two " Rogan Dawes
2010-08-15 21:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-16 5:47 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Rogan Dawes
2010-08-16 5:47 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] " Rogan Dawes
2010-08-26 13:16 ` Rogan Dawes
2010-09-04 8:22 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-09-04 9:07 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-09-05 21:23 ` Rogan Dawes
2010-09-05 22:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-06 5:54 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-09-06 6:03 ` Rogan Dawes
2010-09-06 6:05 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-06 6:45 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-09-06 8:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-06 11:32 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-09-06 12:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-06 17:15 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2010-09-06 19:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C8521A8.6050107@free.fr \
--to=albert.aribaud@free.fr \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox