From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:49:10 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] ARM mach-types.h (was: Re: [PATCH 1/5] add DOCKSTAR
 machine type)
In-Reply-To: <0554BEF07D437848AF01B9C9B5F0BC5DA807E3C8@dlee01.ent.ti.com>
References: <4C873717.6000403@emk-elektronik.de>	<20100908081358.2FA96153798@gemini.denx.de>	<4C874C02.9030801@emk-elektronik.de>	<20100908090819.888211506AA@gemini.denx.de>	<0554BEF07D437848AF01B9C9B5F0BC5DA8AA8E17@dlee01.ent.ti.com>,
	<20100908195304.8C74A1506AA@gemini.denx.de>
	<0554BEF07D437848AF01B9C9B5F0BC5DA807E3C8@dlee01.ent.ti.com>
Message-ID: <4C8E2BD6.9010900@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Am 08.09.2010 22:05, schrieb Paulraj, Sandeep:
> 
> 
>> Yes, I know.
>>
>> The problem we're discussing is that the version of mach-types.h as
>> included in the mainline LInux kernel tree is relatively old when
>> compared to the current state of the ARM machine registry.  The
>> question was if we should risk using something else as reference.
> 
> There is no need to use something different.
> Somebody needs to ask Russell King for an ARM sync request.
> 
> Regards,
> Sandeep
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Hello,

mach-types is updated in linux kernel.

Thomas