From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rogan Dawes Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:12:53 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] cfi_flash: A bit of cleanup and code simplification In-Reply-To: <201009161710.59087.sr@denx.de> References: <201008311333.23539.sr@denx.de> <201009161618.48964.sr@denx.de> <4C9227D1.4090702@dawes.za.net> <201009161710.59087.sr@denx.de> Message-ID: <4C9233F5.5040008@dawes.za.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 2010/09/16 5:10 PM, Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Rogan, > > On Thursday 16 September 2010 16:21:05 Rogan Dawes wrote: >> Have you had any thoughts about what the CONFIG_CFI option should be >> called for the odd flash arrangement on my DNS323? If you let me know >> what to call it, I'll submit a patch. > > Sorry, but no, I have no idea right now. IIRC, this patch I sent you was more > a hack for testing and not ready for upstream acceptance. But please go ahead > and send such a patch, with a name that fits it best form your point of view. > Perhaps others have an idea how best to implement this in a clean way. And at > least its available on the list for reference. > > Cheers, > Stefan Hi Stefan, My problem is that I don't know how to describe the odd address line connection setup. That would lead to a decent name, and a suitable patch would follow shortly thereafter. Rogan