From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 23:12:29 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [NEXT] arm926ejs: add split relocation support In-Reply-To: <20100918204538.74301157D71@gemini.denx.de> References: <1284488741-16899-1-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr> <4C8FC35B.9050902@free.fr> <4C8FDAF0.4090709@dawes.za.net> <4C905F6D.7010902@free.fr> <20100915065944.B6BC015242D@gemini.denx.de> <4C90B904.9020305@free.fr> <20100918204538.74301157D71@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4C952B3D.9000802@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Le 18/09/2010 22:45, Wolfgang Denk a ?crit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > In message<4C90B904.9020305@free.fr> you wrote: >> >>> So far we've been using ISO8859-1 >> >> It is not clear to me whether you're expressing a coding rule or just a >> statement of fact, so I'll ask more precise questions: >> >> 1) is UTF-8 allowed or not in u-boot? >> >> 2) if UTF-8 is allowed along with ISO8859-1, then a) which one should be >> preferred for new files, and b) which should be preferred for patches to >> existing files? >> >> 3) if UTF-8 is not allowed, then what should be done about the 56 u-boot >> source files that currently are UTF-8? >> >> Wolfgang, can you explicitly answer these points? In case the answer to >> question 3 is "they should be converted to ISO", of course being the one >> to raise the issue, I shall be the one to submit the fix. > > So far this has not been "officially" decided yet. My personal > preference is ISO-8859-1, so if nobody protests I suggest we add a > "[i18n] commitencoding = ISO-8859-1" to the .git/config file. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk Thanks -- as promised, I will compile the list of u-boot files currently encoded in UTF-8 and will provide a patch to reencode them to ISO-8895-1. Amicalement, -- Albert.