From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:45:16 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] [NEXT] arm926ejs: reduce code size with -msingle-pic-base In-Reply-To: <4C9B272B.6020803@denx.de> References: <1285163872-20910-1-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr> <1285163872-20910-2-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr> <4C9AFDCA.9090903@denx.de> <4C9B0A2E.6030603@free.fr> <4C9B272B.6020803@denx.de> Message-ID: <4C9B4BDC.3050401@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Le 23/09/2010 12:08, Heiko Schocher a ?crit : > Hmm.. I don;t know the other boards ... so, I decided for > the relocation patches not to fix all arm boards, instead > inroduce the CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC, and board > maintainers (or others who have time for it) can adapt > the boards to this new code. So we always have a chance > to keep track which boards are converted *and* working > and which boards are not working ... so, I could not say, > if it is a good idea to fix other boards, you could not > test (I know, usually we do this fixes, but the relocation > code is such a deep change, I prefer to add only real > tested patches ...) Understood. If only to be consistent with your patches, I will not fix any other board than the ones I can test directly. This leads me to another question: since I cannot test the tx25, I think I should take from your fix only the parts that modify my own patch set, and leave out the parts for tx25, which you would post above my patches. Is this ok? Amicalement, -- Albert.