From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Schocher Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:11:56 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] [NEXT] arm926ejs: reduce code size with -msingle-pic-base In-Reply-To: <4C9B4BDC.3050401@free.fr> References: <1285163872-20910-1-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr> <1285163872-20910-2-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr> <4C9AFDCA.9090903@denx.de> <4C9B0A2E.6030603@free.fr> <4C9B272B.6020803@denx.de> <4C9B4BDC.3050401@free.fr> Message-ID: <4C9C331C.2060709@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello Albert, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 23/09/2010 12:08, Heiko Schocher a ?crit : > >> Hmm.. I don;t know the other boards ... so, I decided for >> the relocation patches not to fix all arm boards, instead >> inroduce the CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC, and board >> maintainers (or others who have time for it) can adapt >> the boards to this new code. So we always have a chance >> to keep track which boards are converted *and* working >> and which boards are not working ... so, I could not say, >> if it is a good idea to fix other boards, you could not >> test (I know, usually we do this fixes, but the relocation >> code is such a deep change, I prefer to add only real >> tested patches ...) > > Understood. If only to be consistent with your patches, I will not fix > any other board than the ones I can test directly. > > This leads me to another question: since I cannot test the tx25, I think I test it ;-) > I should take from your fix only the parts that modify my own patch set, > and leave out the parts for tx25, which you would post above my patches. > Is this ok? I prefer to have this change in one patch, because if we do it so, we don;t break "git bisect" functionallity. bye, Heiko -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany