From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rogan Dawes Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:58:58 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] [NEXT] arm926ejs: reduce code size with -msingle-pic-base In-Reply-To: <4C9CD5A0.6060207@dawes.za.net> References: <1285163872-20910-1-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr> <1285163872-20910-2-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr> <4C9AFDCA.9090903@denx.de> <4C9B0A2E.6030603@free.fr> <4C9B272B.6020803@denx.de> <4C9B4BDC.3050401@free.fr> <4C9C331C.2060709@denx.de> <4C9C3B71.9090709@free.fr> <4C9CD5A0.6060207@dawes.za.net> Message-ID: <4C9CD8D2.7040306@dawes.za.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 2010/09/24 6:45 PM, Rogan Dawes wrote: > On 2010/09/24 7:47 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >> On a side note, I do not know of a clear general definition of >> 'bisectability', which means I could break it yet again unkonwingly. Can >> you (or anyone, actually :) ) point me to a, or even the, standard >> definition of 'bisectable' and, if that has a specific meaning, of >> 'fully bisectable'? Here's a decent LWN.net article on the topic: http://lwn.net/Articles/317154/ Rogan