From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Schocher Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 10:57:20 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, question to Heiko In-Reply-To: <4CA99040.2020304@free.fr> References: <4CA49746.2050301@emk-elektronik.de> <4CA570D3.9040406@denx.de> <4CA57468.6090702@free.fr> <4CA57762.3000201@denx.de> <4CA5821E.3070108@emk-elektronik.de> <4CA5873B.6040907@free.fr> <4CA590E6.6070701@emk-elektronik.de> <4CA59B89.6090207@denx.de> <4CA5BB7A.8050304@emk-elektronik.de> <20101001105506.A64D41539A0@gemini.denx.de> <4CA5BFEF.3090208@emk-elektronik.de> <20101001112125.4076E153A7E@gemini.denx.de> <4CA5C7DE.6010300@emk-elektronik.de> <20101001115908.A34411539A0@gemini.denx.de> <4CA5D26D.2090505@emk-elektronik.de> <4CA5D857.5010009@emk-elektronik.de> <20101001125502.D0B4E1539A0@gemini.denx.de> <4CA6DC16.5040409@emk-elektronik.de> <4CA6E517.9040701@free.fr> <4CA6E8E5.2090605@emk-elektronik.de> <20101003180349.96F3C153A7E@gemini.denx.de> <4CA8CCC1.2010309@free.fr> <4CA96F60.50900@denx.de> <4CA976C6.9000009@free.fr> <4CA981E4.3020207@emk-elektronik.de> <4CA99040.2020304@free.fr> Message-ID: <4CA996F0.3080707@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello Albert, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 04/10/2010 09:27, Reinhard Meyer a ?crit : >> Dear Albert ARIBAUD, >>> >>> Right now I can build (not run, mind you) u-boot for edminiv2 without >>> -fPIC/-fPIE, with -pie and a modified u-boot.lds and start.S. Almost all >>> of the .rel.dyn fixup entries are type 23, that is, relative to the base >>> address, which is good. However, here are about ten at the end which are >>> type 2 -- symbol-relative -- and I am studying them in order to see if >>> they are needed. >>> >>> If type 23 relocations are all that is needed, then a first ARM ELF >>> relocation implementation should 'simply' trade GOT vs .rel.dyn >>> relocation in start.S (I am almost there) and remove fixups in >>> board_init_r. Start.S would apply type 23 fixups only and ignore the >>> rest. Later on we could add a build stage to rewrite the .rel.dyn >>> section as suggested, by filtering out non-type-23 relocs and keeping >>> only the address part of type-23 ones, reducing the .rel.dyn table >>> roughly by half. >>> >>> The good news is, I can spare a couple more hours today on this. I'll >>> let you all know how this fares! >> >> Thats good news! How much did the image size increase with this table? > > ./MAKEALL edminiv2 results: > > text data bss dec hex filename > 141376 4388 16640 162404 27a64 ./u-boot (for GOT > reloc) > 150160 3819 16640 170619 29a7b ./u-boot (for ELF > reloc) > > u-boot.bin size in bytes: > > 145764 (for GOT reloc) > 153976 (for ELF reloc) Huh... > The .rel.dyn table is 18472 bytes, and should eventually shrink by half, > losing about 9 KB. That would bring the u-boot.bin size down to > 145 KB, roughly the same size as GOT reloc -- plus we'd save a few code ... puuh ;-) > bytes since reloc fixup functions in board_init_r would not be needed > any more. Sounds good. And we can easy test this, by defining CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS for all arm boards ... >> And I am willing to test your efforts on AT91 here, maybe you can send me >> the changes to .lds and start.S beforehand so I can see what type of >> relocation info gets produced here. > > I'll post an RFC patch within one or two hours. Thanks! I am wating for it, and try your patches too. bye, Heiko -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany