From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:29:03 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] [PATCH V2] arm: arm926ejs: use ELF relocations
In-Reply-To: <4CAAEDAE.9040908@emk-elektronik.de>
References: <1286260287-1571-1-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr>
	<20101005064516.AEA4C153A7E@gemini.denx.de>
	<4CAACE47.5090105@emk-elektronik.de>
	<4CAAD255.1080501@emk-elektronik.de>
	<4CAAD944.2040309@emk-elektronik.de> <4CAAE2C5.4040304@denx.de>
	<4CAAE4BF.3030306@free.fr> <4CAAE949.1010200@denx.de>
	<4CAAEB84.2070602@emk-elektronik.de> <4CAAECA1.8090903@denx.de>
	<4CAAEDAE.9040908@emk-elektronik.de>
Message-ID: <4CAAEFDF.5080803@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hello Reinhard,

Reinhard Meyer wrote:
> Dear Heiko Schocher,
> 
>> ... but I don;t know if this is the right change! Better would
>> be to know, why the last entry in __rel_dyn_start is filled with
>> 00000000 ...
> 
> As an EOF marker, maybe?

Hmm... don;t know, but I didn;t see this for example on the
magnesium board ...

> Maybe the loop should be left by ble and a test for zero of an entry?

Maybe yes.

> Umm "ble" seems wrong to me anyway:

Yep, as I said, it is just a fast fix ...

> start = first entry, end = address AFTER last entry,
> so it should be "blt", or?

Yep. But I think, ble is right ... we should know, why this
entry is filled with 00000000

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany