From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] [PATCH V2] arm: arm926ejs: use ELF relocations
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:17:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CAB0957.4070702@emk-elektronik.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CAB0793.4000300@free.fr>
Dear All ;)
>> Umm... is my understanding correct that we can drop the whole
>> CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC stuff then, too?
>
> I believe we're just changing the relocation solution, but we're not
> changing the overall strategy regarding CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC.
We should not forget that right now, the "ELF" method uses 8 byte entries
to relocate, compared to 4 byte entries with the "GOT" method. We
should not proceed too fast here, the "thought about" tool to squeeze down
the relocation information should not be completely forgotten...
Otherwise even more boards would need to change their mtd partitioning ;)
And I am not too happy if I cannot downgrade to the AT91SAM9XE256 anymore
(256K NOR) if the 512K version proves difficult to obtain ;)
Reinhard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-05 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-05 6:31 [U-Boot] [RFC] [PATCH V2] arm: arm926ejs: use ELF relocations Albert Aribaud
2010-10-05 6:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-05 7:05 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-05 7:23 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-05 7:52 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-05 8:33 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-05 8:41 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-05 9:00 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-05 9:10 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-05 9:15 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-05 9:19 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-05 9:29 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-05 9:33 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-05 9:39 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-05 10:11 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-05 10:36 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-05 10:49 ` Graeme Russ
2010-10-05 11:01 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-05 11:18 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-05 10:33 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-05 10:40 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-05 11:10 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-05 11:17 ` Reinhard Meyer [this message]
2010-10-05 11:46 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-05 13:18 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-05 13:24 ` Graeme Russ
2010-10-05 13:36 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-05 14:06 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-05 11:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-05 10:20 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-05 8:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-05 8:38 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-05 8:50 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-05 8:59 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-05 7:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-05 7:40 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-05 8:32 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-05 8:02 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-05 9:25 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-05 9:32 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-05 12:07 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-05 12:52 ` Heiko Schocher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CAB0957.4070702@emk-elektronik.de \
--to=u-boot@emk-elektronik.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox