From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:21:33 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] at91rm9200ek: convert to at91
In-Reply-To: <4CBC1319.4030604@gmail.com>
References: <1287189674-95445-1-git-send-email-andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
	<1287189674-95445-2-git-send-email-andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
	<4CBB3B3B.8040408@emk-elektronik.de>
	<5704DFFE-9C3D-4648-A739-BBBFCE2685A3@googlemail.com>
	<4CBC07E8.7020901@emk-elektronik.de> <4CBC1319.4030604@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4CBC2DBD.1000506@emk-elektronik.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Andreas Bie?mann,

> I plan to merge at91rm9200_usart and at91_usart for 2011.03. It will
> introduce clear naming scheme in at91 (USRT3 vs DBGU). Also I plan to
> remove the necessity to hardcode the base addresses in header of
> at91_usart.c. But to do this we need a clean basis to test the changes.

at91sam9* uses "atmel_usart", not "at91_usart". You should merge the "rm"
usart into "atmel_usart" which currently works for AT91SAM9 and AVR32.