From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Most ARM CPU's have buggy clear_bss?
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:36:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC919E4.6010904@emk-elektronik.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC914D8.4070101@denx.de>
Dear Heiko Schocher,
> Hmm.. I think the question is, is CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT not
> obsolete?
Why don't we remove ALL that dead code ASAP from ARM start.S and board.c files?
All unmaintained ARM boards are now broken anyway, and those that are fixed are
using elf relocation.
(I know that there is a 'promise' to keep ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC until next March,
but does that really make sense anymore?)
Reinhard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-28 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-27 7:26 [U-Boot] Most ARM CPU's have buggy clear_bss? Darius Augulis
2010-10-27 8:01 ` Sughosh Ganu
2010-10-27 8:22 ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-27 8:54 ` Sughosh Ganu
2010-10-27 8:58 ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-27 9:09 ` Sughosh Ganu
2010-10-27 10:10 ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-27 10:40 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-27 10:59 ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-27 11:41 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-27 15:12 ` Eric Cooper
2010-10-27 18:11 ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-28 5:50 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-28 6:09 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28 6:17 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-28 6:20 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28 6:23 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28 6:35 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-28 6:14 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-28 6:36 ` Reinhard Meyer [this message]
2010-10-28 6:56 ` Darius Augulis
2010-10-28 8:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 8:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 8:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 8:53 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-28 10:23 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-28 11:16 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28 11:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 11:55 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-29 9:29 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-28 11:46 ` [U-Boot] CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT still used? Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 9:32 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 11:32 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 11:43 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 11:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 9:03 ` [U-Boot] Most ARM CPU's have buggy clear_bss? Alexander Holler
2010-10-28 9:31 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 8:50 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 9:19 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 11:56 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 12:08 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 12:31 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 13:37 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 13:50 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 14:04 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 14:37 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 14:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 14:50 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 14:50 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-29 14:58 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 14:54 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 15:05 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 15:23 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 15:32 ` Alexander Holler
2010-10-29 15:38 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 16:56 ` Alexander Holler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC919E4.6010904@emk-elektronik.de \
--to=u-boot@emk-elektronik.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox