From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC 0/3] ARM Relocation Config Cleanup
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:22:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CCAAE5D.3040000@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101029101319.A1044134F44@gemini.denx.de>
Le 29/10/2010 12:13, Wolfgang Denk a ?crit :
> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
>
> In message<4CCA87B9.5090203@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote:
>> Dear Wolfgang Denk,
>>> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
>>>
>>> In message<4CC9E2A7.3080506@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote:
>>>>> Replace CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS by CONFIG_BROKEN_RELOC_FIXUP
>>>> Seems a slight misnomer to me, and a bit hides what it really does. What about
>>>> CONFIG_NEEDS_DATA_RELOC_FIXUP ?
>>>
>>> Thinking about that, I feel the name is too long. And eventually not
>>> clear enough either.
>>>
>>> How about CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC ?
>> OK, since I had that in mind, too. I skipped it however since "manual" for me
>> smells like really some extra manual labour.
>> But I guess any full descriptive term would be too long.
>
> Yes, that's what I think too.
>
> OK, renamed into CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC.
Wait... This is the other way around, isn't it? When a board defines
CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS, it means "no need to do manual fixups", I think.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-29 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-28 19:12 [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC 0/3] ARM Relocation Config Cleanup Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 19:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC 1/3] Replace CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS by CONFIG_BROKEN_RELOC_FIXUP Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 19:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 19:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC 2/3] Drop support for CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 19:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 19:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC 3/3] Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 19:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 20:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC 0/3] ARM Relocation Config Cleanup Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28 21:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 5:49 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-29 8:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 8:37 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-29 10:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 11:22 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2010-10-29 11:30 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 11:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 5:42 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-29 10:50 ` Reinhard Meyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CCAAE5D.3040000@free.fr \
--to=albert.aribaud@free.fr \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox