[U-Boot] ARM: problem with linker option -pie

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>]

Le 31/10/2010 11:35, Wolfgang Denk a ?crit :
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>
> In message<4CCD3A6F.7040303@free.fr>  you wrote:
>>
>> The first test I did with a sample program which contains the three
>> types of static scope objects: const, initialized and uninitialized, and
>> I checked that the inititialized one lands in BSS which has NOBITS while
>> explicitely initialized objects land in data sections with PROGBITS --
>> that's akin to the LOAD attribute.
>
> Thanks for checking.
>
>> Both the ELDK 4.2 and the CS toolchains' linkers treat all three object
>> types the same way with respect to relocation, and emit relocations to
>> the uninitialized object, so not having LOAD attribute is irrelevant --
>> BTW if it was, BSS relocation would never have worked.
>
> Yes, I know. My speculation was that suchbehaviour (or linker options
> to adjust it) might have changed in more recent versions of
> gcc/binutils.

Understood. Apparently it hasn't as such.

> BTW: I would like to point out that so far we're blaming GCC, which is
> not exaclt correct, as we always tested GCC+Binutils combos. For
> completeness, we should separate compilation and linking and test for
> example ELDK's gcc with CS's ld, and vice versa.  Hope I will find
> some time later this night.  Hope the ghosts won't make too much of a
> noise.

Correct, gcc and binutils are different things. In my (admittedly 
simple) test I'd looked at both toe .o files and the elf binaries, so 
either stage seems ok; and you're correct that 'cross-building' one gcc 
with the other linker is a useful set of tests to perform.

For the sake of completeness, as a reminder, the -pie option is a pure 
linker option: the gcc stage is the same whether ELF relocation is 
generated or not; that would *slightly* weight toward the linker as a 
culprit, but let's not haste to conclusions especially with such a weird 
issue.

I'll try 'cross-building' either this morning or in the early afternoon.

> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.