From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 23:28:29 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] arm926ejs: fix jump to RAM nand_boot
In-Reply-To: <1288560046-6458-1-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr>
References: <20101031203243.478E9EA47F@gemini.denx.de>	<1288547025-16877-1-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr>	<20101031181244.419EDEA47F@gemini.denx.de>	<4CCDB78D.506@ahsoftware.de>	<20101031190136.64829EA47F@gemini.denx.de>	<4CCDBE71.1010805@free.fr>	<20101031192243.7AF531522C0@gemini.denx.de>	<4CCDC625.3010209@free.fr>	<20101031195941.5AB961522C0@gemini.denx.de>	<4CCDD02D.2050304@free.fr>
	<1288560046-6458-1-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr>
Message-ID: <4CCDED8D.0@ahsoftware.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 31.10.2010 22:20, Albert Aribaud wrote:

> Alexander, Darius, others who already tested the previous RFC patch,
> please test for non-regression.

Still works here with that patch applied. But that isn't remarkable, because

>   #ifdef CONFIG_NAND_SPL

that isn't defined here. ;)

Regards,

Alexander