From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:04:28 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] arm926ejs: fix jump to RAM nand_boot In-Reply-To: <4CCDED8D.0@ahsoftware.de> References: <20101031203243.478E9EA47F@gemini.denx.de> <1288547025-16877-1-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr> <20101031181244.419EDEA47F@gemini.denx.de> <4CCDB78D.506@ahsoftware.de> <20101031190136.64829EA47F@gemini.denx.de> <4CCDBE71.1010805@free.fr> <20101031192243.7AF531522C0@gemini.denx.de> <4CCDC625.3010209@free.fr> <20101031195941.5AB961522C0@gemini.denx.de> <4CCDD02D.2050304@free.fr> <1288560046-6458-1-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr> <4CCDED8D.0@ahsoftware.de> Message-ID: <4CCDF5FC.4060704@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Le 31/10/2010 23:28, Alexander Holler a ?crit : > On 31.10.2010 22:20, Albert Aribaud wrote: > >> Alexander, Darius, others who already tested the previous RFC patch, >> please test for non-regression. > > Still works here with that patch applied. But that isn't remarkable, because > >> #ifdef CONFIG_NAND_SPL > > that isn't defined here. ;) ... and tx25 seems not to have it defined either, so my change should not have affected Wolfgang's tests. :/ Wolfgang, could you: - make available to me the exact source tree you're compiling, including my patches as you applied them plus your changes to them, either as a clonable git repo or as a patch set to apply on the current u-boot master branch; - indicate exactly how you build your u-boot; - provide the u-boot binary that you last built (the one that has no output). My goal here is to reproduce an u-boot identical to yours, in order to make sur I can produce controlled u-boots for tx25, and then build some specific tx25 u-boots for you to run. Amicalement, -- Albert.