From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:12:59 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] arm926ejs: fix jump to RAM nand_boot In-Reply-To: References: <20101031203243.478E9EA47F@gemini.denx.de> <1288547025-16877-1-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr> <20101031181244.419EDEA47F@gemini.denx.de> <4CCDB78D.506@ahsoftware.de> <20101031190136.64829EA47F@gemini.denx.de> <4CCDBE71.1010805@free.fr> <20101031192243.7AF531522C0@gemini.denx.de> <4CCDC625.3010209@free.fr> <20101031195941.5AB961522C0@gemini.denx.de> <4CCDD02D.2050304@free.fr> <1288560046-6458-1-git-send-email-albert.aribaud@free.fr> <4CCDED8D.0@ahsoftware.de> <4CCDF5FC.4060704@free.fr> Message-ID: <4CCE768B.1010809@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Le 01/11/2010 06:13, sughosh ganu a ?crit : > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Albert ARIBAUDwrote: > >> Le 31/10/2010 23:28, Alexander Holler a ?crit : >>> On 31.10.2010 22:20, Albert Aribaud wrote: >>> >>>> Alexander, Darius, others who already tested the previous RFC patch, >>>> please test for non-regression. >>> >>> Still works here with that patch applied. But that isn't remarkable, >> because >>> >>>> #ifdef CONFIG_NAND_SPL >>> >>> that isn't defined here. ;) >> >> ... and tx25 seems not to have it defined either, so my change should >> not have affected Wolfgang's tests. :/ >> > > I think it is defined in nand_spl/board/karo/tx25/Makefile. We do get a > nand_spl/u-boot-spl when we compile for the tx25 board, which has a > reference to nand_boot. Thanks Sugish. Which commands do you use to build the tx25? I tried make distclean; make tx25_config; make and ./MAKEALL tx25 ... but this ends up with the code in start.S as if NAND_SPL was not defined, i.e. calling board_inir_r, not nand_boot. > -sughosh Amicalement, -- Albert.