From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:19:44 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3 V5] Remove board_init_f function from nand_boot.c In-Reply-To: <20101101131438.0c874d7d@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> References: <1288634367-9189-1-git-send-email-urwithsughosh@gmail.com> <4CCF0224.1040700@free.fr> <20101101131438.0c874d7d@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> Message-ID: <4CCF04C0.7070101@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Le 01/11/2010 19:14, Scott Wood a ?crit : > On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:08:36 +0100 > Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >> Le 01/11/2010 18:59, Sughosh Ganu a ?crit : >> >>> Remove the board_init_f function from nand_spl/nand_boot.c. This >>> function is to be defined by all boards using the nand_spl >>> functionality in their individual board directory. >> >> Sorry, there's one thing I don't get, but I must admit I don't know the >> intricacies of NAND booting yet. Why should this be individualized? >> Seems to me that all boards using nand_spl will have the same >> board_init_f(), won't they? > > No, some boards could easily require board-specific init during the > nand spl phase. There's lots of this on the powerpc side, but it > hadn't been required on ARM yet (maybe they do more init in assembly?) > -- until now. That answers it -- thanks. Amicalement, -- Albert.