[U-Boot] [PATCH 06/11] at91: Add defines for spi SoC access

Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-01T08:43:57Z

Dear Alexander Stein,
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h
> index c520e89..75d4324 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,20 @@ typedef struct at91_spi {
> at91_pdc_t pdc;
> } at91_spi_t;

If we touch header and driver anyway, we could get rid of the depreciated typedefs,
to get conform to the coding style.

See discussion about that 1-2 days ago :)

>
> +#define AT91_SPI_CR_SPIEN 0x00000001
> +#define AT91_SPI_CR_SWRST 0x00000080
> +
> +#define AT91_SPI_MR_MSTR 0x00000001
> +#define AT91_SPI_MR_MODFDIS 0x00000004
> +#define AT91_SPI_MR_PCS 0x000f0000
> +
> +#define AT91_SPI_SR_RXBUFF 0x00000040
> +#define AT91_SPI_SR_SPIENS 0x00010000
> +
> +#define AT91_SPI_CSR_NCPHA 0x00000001
> +#define AT91_SPI_CSR_DLYBS 0x00ff0000
> +#define AT91_SPI_CSR_DLYBCT 0xff000000
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY

After that patch, do we still need LEGACY?

Best Regards,
Reinhard