[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: compare actual device addresses with the device tree

Tabi Timur-B04825
2010-11-17T00:21:20Z

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Maybe this can be implemented in a largely CPU independent way? Try to
> make it data-driven, so you can then for example just provide a
> CPU-specific data sructure (array of names / addresses or whatever you
> are checking).

I'm not sure this will work out that well, but I'll try.

>> > Do you want the default weak functions to say something like "not implemented",
>> > or just do nothing at all?
> No news is good news. Make them silent, please.

My only concern with being silent is that if the user types in "fdt verify"
and gets no output, he'll think that his device tree has been verified and
passes all tests.

--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer