From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 19:32:03 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: S3C64XX: fix timer broken by relocation
In-Reply-To: <20101113181301.4ABCA150ADD@gemini.denx.de>
References: <20101101204832.3822.79056.stgit@darius-desktop>	<AANLkTimrexkvXH5br3JowUAr=t6TCki1eNpeZHiYezeE@mail.gmail.com>	<4CDD84E0.4080609@gmail.com>
	<4CDD9495.9010700@free.fr>	<4CDEC32B.7050309@gmail.com>
	<20101113181301.4ABCA150ADD@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4CDED9A3.2020501@free.fr>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Le 13/11/2010 19:13, Wolfgang Denk a ?crit :
> Dear Darius Augulis,
>
> In message<4CDEC32B.7050309@gmail.com>  you wrote:
>>
>>> FWIW, there already is a solution based on statics and post-relocation
>>> initialization for orion5x. The principle there is that the timer is not
>>> used before calling board_init_r, so we don't need initializing
>>> timestamp before relocation.
>
> STOP!!  I don't think we want this.

Just goes to prove a patch can get in mainline master and not get caught 
for being naughy, see commit d778a2fb. :)

As I said before, I am ok with changing this to use a field of gd.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.