public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] RFC: Aligning arch initialisation sequences
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 05:07:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDF6070.20503@emk-elektronik.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101114003501.82985CEA55B@gemini.denx.de>

Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> Yes, and this is correct. board_init_f != board_early_init_f

To make it crystal clear now:

void board_init_f (ulong bootflag)
{
	bd_t *bd;
	init_fnc_t **init_fnc_ptr;
	gd_t *id;
	ulong addr, addr_sp;
+	gd_t auto_gd;

	/* Pointer is writable since we allocated a register for it */
-	gd = (gd_t *) (CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR);
+	gd = &auto_gd;
	/* compiler optimization barrier needed for GCC >= 3.4 */
/* Q: why is that needed anyway ??? */
	__asm__ __volatile__("": : :"memory");

	memset ((void*)gd, 0, sizeof (gd_t));
....
	debug ("relocation Offset is: %08lx\n", gd->reloc_off);
	memcpy (id, (void *)gd, sizeof (gd_t));

	relocate_code (addr_sp, id, addr);

	/* NOTREACHED - relocate_code() does not return */
}

This, and setting CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR to an aligned value in
initial storage (SRAM, pinned down Cache, or other) removes alot
of the headache about making stuff aligned.

Best Regards,
Reinhard

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-11-14  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-07 10:06 [U-Boot] RFC: Aligning arch initialisation sequences Graeme Russ
2010-11-09 23:35 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-11-13  4:16   ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-13  4:58     ` Mike Frysinger
2010-11-13  6:31     ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-13  6:38       ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-13  9:51         ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-13  8:17       ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-13 21:35         ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-13 21:53           ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-13 22:38             ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-13 22:45               ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-13 22:48                 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-14  0:07                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14  0:25                     ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14  0:35                       ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14  1:09                         ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14  9:04                           ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 10:21                             ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 19:43                               ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14  4:07                         ` Reinhard Meyer [this message]
2010-11-14  9:07                           ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 13:46                           ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-14 19:36                             ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 20:16                               ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-14 21:01                                 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-13  8:20     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-13 11:18       ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14  5:10         ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14  5:48           ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14  9:16             ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 10:30               ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 12:10                 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 15:01                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 17:53                     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 19:06                       ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 19:29                         ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 19:55                           ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 20:10                             ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 20:42                               ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 19:23                       ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 19:34                         ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 20:05                           ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 21:27                             ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-15 11:08                             ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 21:51   ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CDF6070.20503@emk-elektronik.de \
    --to=u-boot@emk-elektronik.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox