From: Graeme Russ <graeme.russ@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] RFC: Aligning arch initialisation sequences
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:10:06 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDF6F2E.9040900@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDE741C.1020507@gmail.com>
On 13/11/10 22:18, Graeme Russ wrote:
> On 13/11/10 19:20, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Le 13/11/2010 05:16, Graeme Russ a ?crit :
>>
>>> I essence, the gd pointer is a unique global variable available prior to
>>> relocation. On all other arches, this is achieved by using a reserved
>>> register which I do not have the luxury of on x86 :(
>>
>> Dusting off ooooold knowledge of x86 and without even a glance at x86
>> u-boot... Since GD is the only global used pre-reloc, can you not ensure
>> it always ends up first in the data segment, and then manage two values
>> for the DS segment reg, one pre-reloc where only gd can be used, and one
>> post-reloc where gd and all the other globals can be accessed?
>
> I had though of something similar to that by using GS (which is not
> generally used by u-boot) but it is very messy
>
> All segments are currently setup to be full 4GB with the initial descriptor
> table hard-coded in flash and then reloaded after relocation (it needs to
> be reloaded so it does not get clobbered when erasing flash or relocating
> from RAM). I did have a dynamic GTD calculated in asm using self modifying
> code but changed that out to use the same 'C' methodology as Linux. I would
> prefer not to go back there...
>
> So yes, it is possible, but quite frankly, I would rather leave the init
> functions post relocation than mess around with the GTS pre-relocation
>
OK, I've had a good hard look at this, and setting aside a segment is the
only way that I can think of. I'll need to revisit the self-modifying code
I threw out, but I can live with that small ugliness to bring x86
board_init_f() in line with the other (relocating) arches.
For some bizarre reason, the BIOS emulation layer *yuck* uses GS *double
yuck*. FS is available though
So, I can set aside FS to store the global data pointer, but this
introduces a new problem. To get the pointer, I cannot simply use gd->, I
will need to write a function to retrieve the pointer, so I need gd()->
So I'm thinking of a #define GLOBAL_DATA which all existing arches can
define simply as gd and x86 can define as get_gd_ptr() and I write the
get_gd_ptr() function to extract the pointer using FS
static inline void *get_gd_ptr(void)
{
void *gd_ptr;
asm volatile("gs mov 0, %0\n" : "=r" (gd_ptr));
return gd_ptr;
}
Now I hope the compiler will optimise this down very well. For example,
accessing gd results in the following asm:
/* gd->baudrate = CONFIG_BAUDRATE; */
mov 0x602917c,%eax
movl $0x2580,0x8(%eax)
I would expect using FS to result in something like:
/* gd->baudrate = CONFIG_BAUDRATE; */
mov fs:0x00000000,%eax
movl $0x2580,0x8(%eax)
So no speed or size penalty :)
Does this sound like a plan?
Regards,
Graeme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-14 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-07 10:06 [U-Boot] RFC: Aligning arch initialisation sequences Graeme Russ
2010-11-09 23:35 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-11-13 4:16 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-13 4:58 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-11-13 6:31 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-13 6:38 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-13 9:51 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-13 8:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-13 21:35 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-13 21:53 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-13 22:38 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-13 22:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-13 22:48 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-14 0:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 0:25 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 0:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 1:09 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 9:04 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 10:21 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 19:43 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 4:07 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-14 9:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 13:46 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-14 19:36 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 20:16 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-14 21:01 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-13 8:20 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-13 11:18 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 5:10 ` Graeme Russ [this message]
2010-11-14 5:48 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 9:16 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 10:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 12:10 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 15:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 17:53 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 19:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 19:29 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 19:55 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 20:10 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 20:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 19:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 19:34 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 20:05 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 21:27 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-15 11:08 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 21:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDF6F2E.9040900@gmail.com \
--to=graeme.russ@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox