public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Graeme Russ <graeme.russ@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] RFC: Aligning arch initialisation sequences
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:48:17 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDF7821.4080300@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDF6F2E.9040900@gmail.com>

On 14/11/10 16:10, Graeme Russ wrote:
> On 13/11/10 22:18, Graeme Russ wrote:
>> On 13/11/10 19:20, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>> Le 13/11/2010 05:16, Graeme Russ a ?crit :
>>>

> static inline void *get_gd_ptr(void)
> {
> 	void *gd_ptr;
> 
> 	asm volatile("gs mov 0, %0\n" : "=r" (gd_ptr));
> 	return gd_ptr;
> }
> 

static inline gd_t *get_gd_ptr(void)
{
	gd_t *gd_ptr;

	asm volatile("fs mov 0, %0\n" : "=r" (gd_ptr));
	return gd_ptr;
}

works a treat :)

Is there any reason the other arches could not implement an inline function
as well? ARM for example:

-#define DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR     register volatile gd_t *gd asm ("r8")

+static inline gd_t *gd(void)
+{
+	gd_t *gd_ptr;
+
+	asm volatile("mov r8, %0\n" : "=r" (gd_ptr));
+	return gd_ptr;
+}

Is the compiler smart enough to optimise out and not increase code size?

If so, all the arches can have identical implementations for using global data

Regards,

Graeme

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-14  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-07 10:06 [U-Boot] RFC: Aligning arch initialisation sequences Graeme Russ
2010-11-09 23:35 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-11-13  4:16   ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-13  4:58     ` Mike Frysinger
2010-11-13  6:31     ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-13  6:38       ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-13  9:51         ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-13  8:17       ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-13 21:35         ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-13 21:53           ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-13 22:38             ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-13 22:45               ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-13 22:48                 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-14  0:07                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14  0:25                     ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14  0:35                       ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14  1:09                         ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14  9:04                           ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 10:21                             ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 19:43                               ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14  4:07                         ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-14  9:07                           ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 13:46                           ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-14 19:36                             ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 20:16                               ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-11-14 21:01                                 ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-13  8:20     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-13 11:18       ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14  5:10         ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14  5:48           ` Graeme Russ [this message]
2010-11-14  9:16             ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 10:30               ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 12:10                 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 15:01                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 17:53                     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 19:06                       ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 19:29                         ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 19:55                           ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 20:10                             ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 20:42                               ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 19:23                       ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-14 19:34                         ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 20:05                           ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-11-14 21:27                             ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-15 11:08                             ` Graeme Russ
2010-11-14 21:51   ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CDF7821.4080300@gmail.com \
    --to=graeme.russ@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox