public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMv7: Fix linker errors across	toolchain	versions
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 07:59:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF743E6.60706@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CF6C09A.7050206@free.fr>

Le 01/12/2010 22:39, Albert ARIBAUD a ?crit :
> This one is a conundrum.
>
> Using 2010q1, building omap3_evm causes a linker warning
> "arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld: u-boot: section .bss vma 0x8003e8f0 overlaps
> previous sections" while building omap3_beagle does not cause any linker
> warning.
>
> Both boards use the same armv7 u-boot.lds and have a .bss which is way
> bigger than the .rel.dyn plus .dynsym sections that it does overlay.
> IOW, they have a similar layout for .rel.dyn, .dynsym and .bss, but one
> gets the warning and one does not.
>
> The one difference a readelf shows is that for beagle, there is only one
> segment:
>
> 00  .text .rodata .hash .data .got.plt .u_boot_cmd .rel.dyn .dynsym
>
> While for evm there is
>
> 00  .text .rodata .hash .data .got.plt .u_boot_cmd .rel.dyn .bss
> 01  .dynsym
>
> Note that .bss has appeared in segment 00 for evm, whereas it was absent
> for beagle, and that .dynsym was rejected to a second segment -- why? I
> don't know.
>
> Note: I've tried with putting input sections .rel.dyn and .dynsym into a
> single output section .rel.dyn: this makes the second segment disappear,
> but for evm the warning remains and .bss remains in the segment.

I have a tiny clue.

Starting with the fact that the linker issue is only for one board, 
omap3_evm, I looked up the board-specific code. First thing that I 
noticed was

	static u8 omap3_evm_version;

I changed this to

	static u8 omap3_evm_version = 1;

so that the static was moved out of BSS and the linker warning 
disappeared (reminder: v2010.12-rc2, omap3_evm, arm-2010q1).

Now this is not the first static BSS variable we use in U-Boot, and the 
others did not cause linker warnings (not *all* the others, at least), 
so the real cause is yet unknown to me. But that's at least a lead we 
can follow.

If this BSS variable is used before relocation (I haven't checked this), 
then anyway it'll have to move; in that case I'll keep an eye on this 
linker warning and try to sort it out if I get time.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-02  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-01 15:17 [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMv7: Fix linker errors across toolchain versions Sanjeev Premi
2010-12-01 15:58 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-12-01 19:55   ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-01 17:13 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-01 17:19   ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-12-01 17:32     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-01 18:19       ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-12-01 18:36         ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-01 18:54           ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-12-01 21:39             ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-02  6:59               ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2010-12-02  7:34                 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-02  7:51                   ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-02  8:13                     ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-02  8:26                       ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-02  8:30                         ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-12-02  8:42                           ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-02 11:25                             ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-12-02 11:39                               ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-02 12:45                                 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-12-02 14:00                                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-02  8:56                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-02  8:14                     ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-12-02  8:18                 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-12-01 20:08         ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-01 18:23       ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-12-01 18:28         ` Albert ARIBAUD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CF743E6.60706@free.fr \
    --to=albert.aribaud@free.fr \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox