From: Jens Scharsig <js_at_ng@scharsoft.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91rm9200: fix lowlevel_init() SMRDATA size
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:37:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CFA27E6.9040505@scharsoft.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9F070302-8F01-4B12-A8E1-8BC5BDDF3C94@googlemail.com>
Dear Andreas,
> It would be great if you can test that pllloop thing to indicate the wrong counter (80 instead of 40) did (or not) break anything. So the question is do we need that specific patch in v2010.12 to get arm920t/at91 boards working or is it a 'nice to have' for future releases, e.g. when we do a complete rework of the lowlevel_init() for arm920t/at91.
>
I don't think that this will be fix the nor boot problems.
In my opinion, we have some SOC specific problems:
1. In start.s the vector table is relocated from _start to 0x00. But at this time 0x00 is remaped to nor flash.
2. On NOR boot we have no RAM at 0x00, until SRAM is remaped whit Remap Control Register. Nowhere fount in source.
3. On start NOR is mapped to address 0x0. So if we use 0x1000000 as textbase the board hangs after relocation.
4. I can't found any code to setup CS0 timings (use (slow) defaults only)
But, I can not check my thesis, until I get back my JTAG debugger end of next week.
regard
Jens Scharsig
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-04 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-03 7:26 [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91rm9200: fix lowlevel_init() SMRDATA size Andreas Bießmann
2010-12-03 17:09 ` Jens Scharsig
2010-12-03 21:22 ` Andreas Bießmann
2010-12-04 11:37 ` Jens Scharsig [this message]
2010-12-04 12:04 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-04 13:14 ` Andreas Bießmann
2010-12-04 18:18 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-04 10:53 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH alternate version] " Jens Scharsig
2010-12-04 13:12 ` Andreas Bießmann
2010-12-04 13:19 ` Andreas Bießmann
2010-12-05 8:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH alternate version V2] " Jens Scharsig
2010-12-05 10:16 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-12-06 17:36 ` Jens Scharsig
2010-12-06 21:03 ` Andreas Bießmann
2010-12-12 19:12 ` Jens Scharsig
2010-12-17 7:55 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-12-23 11:37 ` Andreas Bießmann
2010-12-18 12:30 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH alternate V3] " Jens Scharsig
2010-12-23 11:39 ` Andreas Bießmann
2010-12-23 12:13 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-12-23 13:05 ` Jens Scharsig
2011-04-11 9:58 ` Reinhard Meyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CFA27E6.9040505@scharsoft.de \
--to=js_at_ng@scharsoft.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox