From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 23:50:53 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] git merge summary
In-Reply-To: <m2mxxreamw.fsf@ohwell.denx.de>
References: <4BAFC7A6.1060805@ahsoftware.de> <m2mxxreamw.fsf@ohwell.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4D0D3ACD.60407@ahsoftware.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hello,

may I ask again for opinions about enabling that feature?

Regards,

Alexander

Am 29.03.2010 11:32, schrieb Detlev Zundel:
> Hi Alexander,
>
>> may I ask if there is reason why merge commits don't have a summary?
>
> Yes, you may.  Actually this is a good question.
>
>> I find those summaries (enabled with git config [--global] merge.summary
>> true) very hand to see what was changed with the merge commit.
>
> I didn't even know about that feature, so thanks for poking us.
> Checking the documentation, it seems like the name will change soon
> however (man git-fmt-merge-msg):
>
>         merge.summary
>             Synonym to merge.log; this is deprecated and will be removed
>             in the future.
>
> But apart from that, I also like the feature.  Wolfgang, what do you
> think?
>
> Cheers
>    Detlev
>