From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2] ARM: Avoid compiler optimization for usages of readb, writeb and friends.
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:28:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0DEC74.4070300@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D0DDCEF.2040806@ahsoftware.de>
Le 19/12/2010 11:22, Alexander Holler a ?crit :
> Hello,
>
> On 19.12.2010 08:51, Dirk Behme wrote:
>> On 18.12.2010 23:27, Alexander Holler wrote:
>>> gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
>>> avoid that as done in the kernel.
>>>
>
>> Acked-by: Dirk Behme<dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
>
> Thanks for the ack, but I have to say, that those barriers are having
> side effects here. Reading NAND now fails on my BeagleBoard. Regardless
> if I use gcc 4.3.5 or gcc 4.5.1, after applying that patch the wrong ID
> of the NAND is read. In nand_get_flash_type()
> (drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c) without that patch I will get the following:
>
> *maf_id: 44, dev_id: 186
>
> with the patch the following is read:
>
> *maf_id: 128, dev_id: 85
>
> Which just is wrong.
>
> I haven't looked further up to now, maybe thats just a side effect of
> some wrong clock settings because of different timings through those
> barrieres or whatever.
IIUC, the patch is adding barriers to every HW register write and read,
which makes the compiler stop reordering these, and keep them ordered as
in the source code. Are you sure that the order as laid out in the
source is the right one? Maybe you were just luck so far that the
reordering masked a bug.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-19 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-18 22:27 [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2] ARM: Avoid compiler optimization for usages of readb, writeb and friends Alexander Holler
2010-12-19 7:51 ` Dirk Behme
2010-12-19 10:22 ` Alexander Holler
2010-12-19 11:28 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2010-12-19 16:34 ` Alexander Holler
2010-12-19 18:45 ` John Rigby
2010-12-19 19:59 ` Alexander Holler
2010-12-20 0:39 ` John Rigby
2010-12-20 0:56 ` Alexander Holler
2010-12-20 4:18 ` John Rigby
2010-12-20 6:07 ` John Rigby
2010-12-20 6:49 ` Dirk Behme
2010-12-20 7:37 ` John Rigby
2010-12-20 16:08 ` John Rigby
2010-12-20 16:12 ` John Rigby
2011-01-17 4:35 ` Alexander Holler
2010-12-20 17:12 ` Alexander Holler
2010-12-21 0:25 ` John Rigby
2010-12-21 0:46 ` John Rigby
2010-12-21 7:11 ` Dirk Behme
2010-12-21 7:21 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-21 8:05 ` Dirk Behme
2010-12-21 8:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-21 8:37 ` Dirk Behme
2010-12-21 8:35 ` Dirk Behme
2010-12-21 8:46 ` John Rigby
2010-12-21 10:38 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-21 10:53 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-21 12:35 ` Alexander Holler
2010-12-21 12:51 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-21 13:30 ` Alexander Holler
2010-12-21 14:33 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-21 19:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-21 20:04 ` Dirk Behme
2010-12-21 21:49 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-22 0:11 ` Alexander Holler
2010-12-22 7:02 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-12-22 7:18 ` Dirk Behme
2010-12-22 7:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-23 16:40 ` Dirk Behme
2010-12-22 9:56 ` Alexander Holler
2010-12-21 13:38 ` Alexander Holler
2010-12-22 8:02 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-22 11:23 ` Alexander Holler
2010-12-29 9:40 ` Dirk Behme
2010-12-29 23:10 ` Alessandro Rubini
2010-12-30 10:39 ` Dirk Behme
2011-01-09 22:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D0DEC74.4070300@free.fr \
--to=albert.aribaud@free.fr \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox