From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:25:04 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] Fixing IXP42x boards - some general questions
In-Reply-To: <4D133263.4020402@free.fr>
References: <4D13175F.8030207@discworld.dascon.de>
	<4D132282.9060403@free.fr>	<4D1326C6.10905@discworld.dascon.de>
	<4D133263.4020402@free.fr>
Message-ID: <4D139400.2050004@discworld.dascon.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Am 12/23/2010 12:28 PM, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>
>
>>>> What about interrupts? Use them or avoid them?
>>> I say in any case don't use them before running from RAM; and if you can
>>> avoid them in u-boot without incurring a huge performance penalty, I
>>> would suggest avoiding them altogether.
>> Fine with me. I got the non-interrupt code running, and will simply
>> leave the (broken) interrupt code as is if that is OK.
> Maybe it would be better to remove it. If someone really feels the need 
> to revive it, they can copy back it from a previous commit where it 
> still exists.
OK. It seems the interrupt code is more broken than I thought - the
udelay implementation relies on a variable that is set *before*
relocation - in BSS.

Rather than trying to fix this, I will remove the broken parts.

I'll do some more cleanup next week, test all boards I have here, and
post patches for review.

cu
Michael