From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:17:53 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] Fixing IXP42x boards - some general questions
In-Reply-To: <4D139929.5000700@free.fr>
References: <4D13175F.8030207@discworld.dascon.de>	<4D132282.9060403@free.fr>	<4D1326C6.10905@discworld.dascon.de>	<4D133263.4020402@free.fr>	<4D139400.2050004@discworld.dascon.de>
	<4D139929.5000700@free.fr>
Message-ID: <4D13AE71.30703@discworld.dascon.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Am 12/23/2010 07:47 PM, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> Le 23/12/2010 19:25, Michael Schwingen a ?crit :
>
>> OK. It seems the interrupt code is more broken than I thought - the
>> udelay implementation relies on a variable that is set *before*
>> relocation - in BSS.
> And the non-interrupt code does not?
No. After the rewrite, the code does delay-to-timer-tic conversion and
uses the timebase counter in the IXP (which always counts up, with a
fixed rate, and has an overflow flag) to do the timing.

cu
Michael