From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Babic Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:21:45 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] imximage: Add MX53 boot image support In-Reply-To: References: <1293024231-4897-1-git-send-email-r64343@freescale.com> <1293024231-4897-3-git-send-email-r64343@freescale.com> <4D1870AE.3060206@denx.de> <4D199E6C.7020700@denx.de> Message-ID: <4D19AC29.9060301@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 12/28/2010 09:34 AM, Jason Liu wrote: >> You have sure in Freescale a better visibility how to group together >> this feature. Is the newer header typical for the MX53 or are there >> other processors using the same structure ? John has already pointed out >> that the MX28 is very similar, and, after reading the manual, it seems >> to me it has the same header as the MX53. Can we distinguish with a >> header version ? > > In fact, the group should be the followings, > > mx25/35/51 > mx53 > mx23/28, > > Here the mx23/28 are much different with mx53 and mx25/35/51. > mx23/28 is Sgmatel chips and buy-in by Freescale years before. Ok, understood. >> As I can see, the actual header is used at least by the MX35, not only >> by the MX51. So I would prefer a way to group together processors with >> the same header structure else to define a processor type. > > OK, I get it. You want to use version number to group it. Can we do it: > > mx25/mx35/mx51 --version 1 ? > mx53 --version 2? Ok, fine. Version 1 should be the default value to be compatible with actual boards. Please document the changes in doc/README.imximage, too. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de =====================================================================