[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] SMDK6400:use common arm1176 u-boot.lds of cpu layer

seedshope
2011-01-08T14:54:56Z

On 01/08/2011 02:04 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 07/01/2011 16:53, seedshope a ?crit :
>> From: seedshope<bocui107@gmail.com>
>>
>> Remove u-boot-nand.lds from board/samsung/smdk6400 and
>> use the common u-boot.lds of arm1176 cpu layer. This
>> patch also fix the building errors:
>>
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/s3c64xx/libs3c64xx.o: In function `mem_ctrl_asm_init':
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/s3c64xx/cpu_init.S:32: multiple definition of `mem_ctrl_asm_init'
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/s3c64xx/cpu_init.S:32: first defined here
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.o: In function `_rel_dyn_start_ofs':
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.S:379: undefined reference to `__rel_dyn_start'
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.o: In function `_rel_dyn_end_ofs':
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.S:379: undefined reference to `__rel_dyn_end'
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.o: In function `_dynsym_start_ofs':
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.S:379: undefined reference to `__dynsym_start'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: seedshope<bocui107@googlemail.com>
> In the current u-boot-arm tree, board/samsung/smdk6400/u-boot-nand.lds
> and arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/u-boot.lds are identical; I am thus ok with the
> change in itself since the board lds file was useless, but I am not sure
> the description is valid. Can you double-check this change wrt to the
> link issue?
I am sure the link issue. But I need to adjust the patch. I should be
modify base on
board/samsung/smdk6400/u-boot-nand.lds, Don't delete it.
> Amicalement,