From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Simek Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:50:25 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] asm-offsets: generate bd_t size In-Reply-To: <20110109170830.A2517127@gemini.denx.de> References: <1293213443-11027-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20110109170830.A2517127@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4D2ABA41.7030805@monstr.eu> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Wolfgang and Mike, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Mike Frysinger, > > In message <1293213443-11027-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> you wrote: >> Some ports set up the board info structure at the same time as the global >> data structure, and largely keep them together. So generate a define for >> the board info struct too. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger >> --- >> lib/asm-offsets.c | 3 +++ >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Applied, thanks. I am little bit confused. 1. Mike's patch has broken coding style in his patch ("space"+"space"15) 2. I sent that patch 3 days before Mike. (It is the longer story) http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-December/084095.html I like that the patch is in mainline tree because I need it for Microblaze but I don't quite understand that you beat me about coding style and then you apply patch which has broken coding style. I don't care if that patch is Mike's or mine I would like to be sure what are that acceptance rules. Can you please tell me how this can happen? Best regards, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng) w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Microblaze U-BOOT custodian