[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] ARM: Avoid compiler optimization for usages of readb, writeb and friends.

[Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>]

Dear Wolfgang,

On 09.01.2011 23:25, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Dirk Behme,
>
> In message<4D1F1841.5060508@googlemail.com>  you wrote:
>>
>> Do you like to test the patch in the attachment? I named it 'v4'.
>
> Please send patches inline.
>
>> After some thinking and testing, it seems to me that the volatile
>> optimization issue this patch shall fix is only with the readx()
>> macros. So the idea is to drop all writex() changes done in the v3
>> version of this patch. With dropping the writex() changes, we would
>> drop all issues we discussed with e.g. the GCC statement-expression
>> and the do while workaround, too.
>
> This makes no sense. Even if we experience problems only with read*()
> at the moment, we should to the Rigth Thing (TM) and fix both the
> read*() and write*() functions.

The question I was thinking about with my patch was "what's Right 
Thing?" ;)

It's my understanding that we don't fix read*() and write*() because 
they are broken. We touch them to work around a broken tool chain.

We saw that this specific tool chain has issues with read*(). While 
working around this, we touched write*(), too. This was done in the 
wrong way. So while read*() was fine, write*() was accidentally broken 
(with all tool chains), then. So we could

(a) do write*() correctly, too (as you do in your patch below)

or

(b) just don't touch write*() as it isn't needed to work around the 
read*() tool chain issue (as I proposed in my patch v4)

Anyway:

> Please have a look a the patch I just posted,
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/78056/

I'm fine with that patch.

Thanks

Dirk