From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/7] mxc_spi: add support for i.MX35 processor
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:09:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D36B845.1000908@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110119074848.B5BE52FC@gemini.denx.de>
On 01/19/2011 08:48 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Stefano Babic,
>
> In message <1295012124-15551-6-git-send-email-sbabic@denx.de> you wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c b/drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c
>> index d558137..b353c83 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c
>> @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ static unsigned long spi_bases[] = {
>> 0x53f84000,
>> };
>>
>> +#define spi_cfg spi_cfg_mx3
> ...
>> +#define spi_cfg spi_cfg_mx51
>
> Hm... this repeats below, but in the end both spi_cfg_mx3() and
> spi_cfg_mx51() are just static functions within the same source file,
> with #ifdef's around them so only one can ever be enabled at a time.
You are right, there is already an #ifdef. I think I had in mind to
remove the #ifdef surrounding the functions, but I give up because I
have added unneeded code (mx51 code for mx3 and viceversa). I will fix it.
>
> I suggest you omit all these "#define spi_cfg" lines and rename both
> versions of these functions into spi_cfg_mx().
>
>> +#define MXC_CSPIRXDATA 0x00
>> +#define MXC_CSPITXDATA 0x04
>> +#define MXC_CSPICTRL 0x08
>> +#define MXC_CSPIINT 0x0C
>> +#define MXC_CSPIDMA 0x10
>> +#define MXC_CSPISTAT 0x14
>> +#define MXC_CSPIPERIOD 0x18
>> +#define MXC_CSPITEST 0x1C
>
> As mentioned before: please use a C struct.
This is another issue. I agree that is ugly code, but it comes from the
originally written driver for the i.MX31. This issue should be fixed,
but in a separate patch, and for all supported processors
(MX.31/MX.25/MX.51/MX.35).
There are at the moment two other patches by Anatolji regarding this
driver. I have already rebased one of them and post to the ML, but I
admit that, as they are not in the same patchset, it is quite difficult
to have an overview of the changes. My proposal is that I will add these
other two patches to my patchset to simplify review.
Best regards,.
Stefano Babic
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-19 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-14 13:35 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/7] Add support for MX35 processor Stefano Babic
2011-01-14 13:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] serial_mxc: add support for Freescale's i.MX35 processor Stefano Babic
2011-01-19 7:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-14 13:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] mxc_i2c: Add support for the " Stefano Babic
2011-01-19 7:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-19 9:46 ` Stefano Babic
2011-01-14 13:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/7] mxc_nand: add support for " Stefano Babic
2011-01-14 18:33 ` Scott Wood
2011-01-14 13:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] Add basic support for Freescale's mc9sdz60 Stefano Babic
2011-01-19 7:40 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-14 13:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/7] mxc_spi: add support for i.MX35 processor Stefano Babic
2011-01-19 7:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-19 10:09 ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2011-01-19 11:40 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-14 13:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/7] Add support for Freescale's mx35pdk board Stefano Babic
2011-01-17 16:43 ` Jason Liu
2011-01-17 16:54 ` Stefano Babic
2011-01-17 17:29 ` Stefano Babic
2011-01-18 9:40 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-18 10:18 ` Stefano Babic
2011-01-19 8:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-19 10:01 ` Stefano Babic
2011-01-19 7:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/7] Add support for MX35 processor Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-19 9:45 ` Stefano Babic
2011-01-19 11:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-19 11:54 ` Stefano Babic
2011-01-21 9:36 ` Detlev Zundel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D36B845.1000908@denx.de \
--to=sbabic@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox