From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Gorsulowski Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:48:30 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot support for board(s) meesc, otc570 In-Reply-To: <4D3586D7.7040009@emk-elektronik.de> References: <20101127215828.7CD40220233A@lilith> <4D072AED.6080703@esd.eu> <4D355CFC.5050806@esd.eu> <4D356200.5000801@aribaud.net> <4D3577A9.8050505@esd.eu> <4D3586D7.7040009@emk-elektronik.de> Message-ID: <4D37E8CE.5010404@esd.eu> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello Reinhard, Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, >> Hello Albert, >> >> Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Le 18/01/2011 10:27, Daniel Gorsulowski a ?crit : >>>> Hello again! >>> >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>>> One month ago, I asked you for help (see message below), but got no >>>> answer. >>> >>> Sorry about that. Last quarter of 2010 was rather busy for me. >>> >>>> Do you see any chance, to fix the at91 tree? >>>> >>>> There is no way to fix my boards, as long as all at91 builds have >>>> fundamental problems. >>>> >>>> I found a patch series from Alexander Stein, but it seems, this series >>>> does not go mainline: >>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-November/080885.html >>>> Should I ask Alexander for resend his pathes? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Daniel >>> >>> Reinhard (Cc:) has lots of fixes in his u-boot-atmel tree; you should try >>> its master branch. I'm leaving below your (unanswered, apologies again) >>> questions for Reinhard to answer. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Albert. >> >> Thanks for your response! >> I tried Reinhards master branch, but build throws same errors as shown >> below. It seems, among other things the atmel usart driver needs an >> update to new SoC access. Alexander Steins patch series seems to add this >> support. >> >> I'll wait for a fix until I send patches for my boards. > > 1. Please send always the mailing list, too! > > 2. Use the rework101229 branch (minus the last 5 patches). > > There is lot of cleanup done in the header files and the ATMEL drivers. > The at91sam9260(9xe)ek board builds fine and works. I can confirm that. > Use that as a template or reference what to do. > You should *only* need to adapt board/*/files and your configs/.h > files. And of course updated entries in boards.cfg. Not quiet. I had to fix arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9263_devices.c additionally. With my adoptions, my boards builds fine. But they do not boot. Can you really confirm that the at91sam9260ek board boots? I have no chance to debug my problems, so I have no idea, why my boards does not boot. Nevertheless, should I send my patches for reviewing? > > Once the rework is done for *almost* *ALL* AT91 SoCs it will be put for > review into mainline, probably for the 06.2011 U-Boot. > > Best Regards, > Reinhard > -- Best Regards, Daniel Gorsulowski ------------------------------------------------------------------------- B.Eng. Daniel Gorsulowski System-Design esd electronic system design gmbh Vahrenwalder Str. 207 - 30165 Hannover - GERMANY Telefon: 0511-37298-192 - Fax: 0511-37298-68 Bitte besuchen Sie uns im Internet unter http://www.esd.eu Quality Products - Made in Germany ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Klaus Detering Amtsgericht Hannover HRB 51373 - VAT-ID DE 115672832 -------------------------------------------------------------------------