[U-Boot] [v4 patch 6/6] SMDK6400: Fix SMDK6400 SDRAM init

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>]

Le 21/01/2011 19:15, seedshope a ?crit :
> On 01/22/2011 02:05 AM, seedshope wrote:
>> On 01/22/2011 01:52 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> seedshope wrote:
>>>
>>>> Since SDRAM init function have already change, So the SDRAM
>>>> initial function must be change.
>>>
>>>     This description sounds somewhat tautological...
>> If I describe  as following:
>> Since SDRAM init function have already change, Modify SDRAM inital
>> function to adapt to it.
>>
>> How about it?

Still unclear, due to the fact you're using the same three terms 
("init/initial, RAM, function") for two apparently different things.

>>>> Signed-off-by: seedshope<bocui107@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>     Your real name is required in the signoff.
>> I use the name for my pen name. It is not problem.

I think Sergei means pen names should not be used. I won't personally 
pass judgment, but so far I've always seen contributors using their 
actual names.

> I feel this may be you e-mail issue. I open my patch, It is display as
> following:
>
> +         gd->ram_size = get_ram_size((long *)CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE,
> +                                    PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE);

Your patch, pulled from patchwork and viewed in vi, has three tabs on 
that second line, which does not align properly. You should check your 
code editor settings re: tabs.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.