[U-Boot] [v4 patch 6/6] SMDK6400: Fix SMDK6400 SDRAM init

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>]

Le 21/01/2011 19:43, seedshope a ?crit :

> On 01/22/2011 02:29 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Le 21/01/2011 19:15, seedshope a ?crit :
>>> On 01/22/2011 02:05 AM, seedshope wrote:
>>>> On 01/22/2011 01:52 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> seedshope wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Since SDRAM init function have already change, So the SDRAM
>>>>>> initial function must be change.
>>>>>       This description sounds somewhat tautological...
>>>> If I describe  as following:
>>>> Since SDRAM init function have already change, Modify SDRAM inital
>>>> function to adapt to it.
>>>>
>>>> How about it?
>> Still unclear, due to the fact you're using the same three terms
>> ("init/initial, RAM, function") for two apparently different things.
> Ya, Maybe, But I don't know to describe it.
>
> The patch is only to modify the dram_init() and dram_init_banksize(),
> Could you help me to describe?
>
> Thank you very much?
> seedshope

The reason for the change to dram_init is not actually about DRAM. If 
you look up similar patches, you'll find out it is about not being able 
to access gd->bd because bd does not exist, and this is so since the ELF 
relocation was introduced. So some good descriptions could be "do not 
use gd->bd any more" or "fix dram_init for relocation support", for 
instance.

>>>>>> Signed-off-by: seedshope<bocui107@gmail.com>
>>>>>       Your real name is required in the signoff.
>>>> I use the name for my pen name. It is not problem.
>> I think Sergei means pen names should not be used. I won't personally
>> pass judgment, but so far I've always seen contributors using their
>> actual names.
>>
> ok
>>> I feel this may be you e-mail issue. I open my patch, It is display as
>>> following:
>>>
>>> +         gd->ram_size = get_ram_size((long *)CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE,
>>> +                                    PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE);
>> Your patch, pulled from patchwork and viewed in vi, has three tabs on
>> that second line, which does not align properly. You should check your
>> code editor settings re: tabs.
> My patch is ok, I just two tabs in my e-mail, But I sent the mail,
> It is change.

Do you send the patch through git format-patch and git send-email? Many 
e-mail softwares have weird issues when posting git patches, which is 
why git has its own tools for sending patches via e-mail.

> Thanks
> hongbo

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.