From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= <eric@eukrea.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:58:25 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] A question in lowlevel_init.S
In-Reply-To: <4D3A89BA.7070303@emk-elektronik.de>
References: <30734554.post@talk.nabble.com> <4D3A8667.7000609@free.fr>
	<4D3A89BA.7070303@emk-elektronik.de>
Message-ID: <4D3AAA41.3080601@eukrea.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi,

On 22/01/2011 08:39, Reinhard Meyer wrote:
> I am not aware of any AT91SAM9xxx systems right now that uses low-level init, it
> would only make sense for those that boot directly from NOR, without
> AT91BOOTSTRAP involved.

cpu9260 (at91sam9260 / 9g20 based) is using low-level init as it boots from 
NOR and is not using at91bootstrap.

Eric