[U-Boot] [v4 patch 6/6] SMDK6400: Fix SMDK6400 SDRAM init

[seedshope <bocui107@gmail.com>]

On 01/22/2011 01:52 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> seedshope wrote:
>
>> Since SDRAM init function have already change, So the SDRAM
>> initial function must be change.
>
> This description sounds somewhat tautological...
>
>> Signed-off-by: seedshope <bocui107@gmail.com>
>
> Your real name is required in the signoff.
>
>> ---
>> board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c 
>> b/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c
>> index 35aa40b..1d03b7a 100644
>> --- a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c
>> +++ b/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c
>> @@ -78,10 +78,18 @@ int board_init(void)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -int dram_init(void)
>> +void dram_init_banksize(void)
>> {
>> + DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>> +
>> gd->bd->bi_dram[0].start = PHYS_SDRAM_1;
>> gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size = PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dram_init(void)
>> +{
>> + gd->ram_size = get_ram_size((long *)CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE,
>> + PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE);
You can look at the web 
site(http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot) for the patch,
It is inconsistent with your description.

Thanks
seedshope
>
> Could you move this last line more to the right?
>
> WBR, Sergei