From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 21:23:21 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] WARNING: in gcc 4.5.0 and 4.5.1 volatile is ignored In-Reply-To: <20110122193008.518AB1365DB@gemini.denx.de> References: <4D3AD19B.6030102@ahsoftware.de> <4D3B1679.20003@googlemail.com> <4D3B1C0C.4040805@free.fr> <20110122193008.518AB1365DB@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4D3B3CB9.2060804@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Le 22/01/2011 20:30, Wolfgang Denk a ?crit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > In message<4D3B1C0C.4040805@free.fr> you wrote: >> >> Le 22/01/2011 18:40, Dirk Behme a =E9crit : >>> On 22.01.2011 13:46, Alexander Holler wrote: >>>> A patch for write?() and read?() is currently in the >>>> u-boot-arm-repository (but not in the master and not in 2010.12): >>>> >>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-January/084885.html >>> >>> What's about pulling it sooner than later into master, then? >> >> I will send out a pull request for u-boot-arm once I have applied all >> outstanding ARM patches from jan 17 or before and all outstanding ARM >> bug fixes regardless of their date, and pulled other ARM repos whose >> custodian requests pulling. > > Thanks - but I also think that Dirk's proposal to create a v2010.12.1 > bug fix release makes sense. What do you think? I didn't comment on this point as it was not for me to decide upon releasing an interim U-boot version :) but I'm fine with it if you do. When I rebase on u-boot/master before sending my pull request, I'll simply skip the corresponding patch in my tree as it will already be on yours. > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk Amicalement, -- Albert.