From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:30:31 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Switch from archive libraries to partial
	linking
In-Reply-To: <1F411EA5-DF55-4B51-931B-45799FD67B1E@kernel.crashing.org>
References: <1289253872-16891-1-git-send-email-sebastien.carlier@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin587yZUJwMTYrnGPjX92gBdcpcJHYtvL_0NWbO@mail.gmail.com>
	<356989C7-FA92-46D5-9FB6-5F9332ECBFD5@kernel.crashing.org>
	<20110125063655.0331EBB0B9@gemini.denx.de>
	<6599F6F0-0DCA-42EE-A460-D50EE50F8274@kernel.crashing.org>
	<4D3EFCF2.4060706@freescale.com>
	<1F411EA5-DF55-4B51-931B-45799FD67B1E@kernel.crashing.org>
Message-ID: <4D3F16C7.7040000@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Kumar Gala wrote:
> * still have to deal with cores that dont have FP

But when will gcc generate FP instructions?  If we compile with soft-float, will
it link in an FP library and use it?

My point is that compiling with soft-float doesn't make much more sense than
compiling with hard-float, since there won't be any floating point instructions
in either case.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale