From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Reinhard Meyer Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:18:54 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] Fix at91 includes in soft_i2c driver In-Reply-To: <4D3FD220.5040406@denx.de> References: <7bc3ea96fb41d5e41ac53281d77d3158bffd3b21.1295995460.git.ryan@bluewatersys.com> <20110126071956.A93F3BB0B9@gemini.denx.de> <4D3FCDA1.6080103@denx.de> <4D3FCF3E.9020404@emk-elektronik.de> <4D3FD220.5040406@denx.de> Message-ID: <4D3FD8EE.6030009@emk-elektronik.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Ryan Mellon, dear Heiko Schocher: >>>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Mallon >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c | 4 +--- >>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> I think this one goes through as a bug fix, i. e. for the upcoming >>>> release. >>>> >>>> The other patches of this series go into next. >>> >>> Ok. Reinhard? Do you pick up this patch? If so, I give my: >>> >>> Acked-by: Heiko Schocher >> >> I was going to complain that it was not alphabetically sorted as I >> suggested to him, >> however I am now considering to remove the AT91RM9200 case altogether. >> That one has to be forced into AT91FAMILY. >> >> Once corrected, I will pickup this patch then. I made up my mind, it should only test for AT91FAMILY. AT91RM9200 is supposed to join AT91FAMILY anyway, so lets do this correctly right now. #if defined(CONFIG_AT91FAMILY) If its done that way, here is my Acked-by: Reinhard Meyer Ryan, can you please change it as such, and preferably post it as a separate patch (not with your new board)? So Heiko can pick it up and make it go as a bug fix to mainline faster than I could do it right now through the "atmel" tree. Best Regards, Reinhard