From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:32:05 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: fix broken build of ARM
In-Reply-To: <4D41DF41.4000708@free.fr>
References: <1296144229-22579-1-git-send-email-sbabic@denx.de>	<4D41CA8B.80401@ahsoftware.de>
	<4D41D3A7.8020900@free.fr> <4D41DBC7.5090203@ahsoftware.de>
	<4D41DF41.4000708@free.fr>
Message-ID: <4D41E455.4000805@ahsoftware.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Am 27.01.2011 22:10, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> Le 27/01/2011 21:55, Alexander Holler a ?crit :
>> Am 27.01.2011 21:20, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>> Hi Alexander,
>>>
>>> Le 27/01/2011 20:42, Alexander Holler a ?crit :
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Am 27.01.2011 17:03, schrieb Stefano Babic:
>>>>> Commit 8aba9dceebb14144e07d19593111ee3a999c37fc breaks
>>>>> ARM boards because for ARM the -pie option is used
>>>>> for partial linking together with -r option.
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch adds the -pie option to link u-boot.bin only.
>>>>
>>>> Using native compilation with gcc 4.5.2 and binutils 2.21 this patch
>>>> will result in an unusable u-boot. It halts here after DRAM: ... just
>>>> like it was before some relocation fixes (regarding binutils).
>>>
>>> Which board do you compile?
>>
>> Upps, sorry, that one was on a BeagleBoard (armv7, omap3).
>
> I've just tried the following to compare make logs of before commit
> 8aba9dceebb14144e07d19593111ee3a999c37fc on the one hand and after this
> commit and with the proposed fix on the other hand:

Oh, it seems I've got misunderstood, the patch from Stefano Babic breaks 
u-boot here and not the commit 8aba9dceebb14144e07d19593111ee3a999c37fc.

Regards,

Alexander