From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:32:25 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: fix broken build of ARM
In-Reply-To: <20110127211428.B1FF6CEA577@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1296144229-22579-1-git-send-email-sbabic@denx.de>
	<4D41CA8B.80401@ahsoftware.de> <4D41D3A7.8020900@free.fr>
	<4D41DBC7.5090203@ahsoftware.de> <4D41DF41.4000708@free.fr>
	<20110127211428.B1FF6CEA577@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4D41E469.1020104@free.fr>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Le 27/01/2011 22:14, Wolfgang Denk a ?crit :
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>
> In message<4D41DF41.4000708@free.fr>  you wrote:
>>
>> So I think the binary should be pretty much the same in the 'old' and
>> 'new' cases, and that should be irrespective of the tool chain.
>>
>> Alexander, can you run the same test with your BeagleBoard and let me
>> know of any differences?
>
> Also running a diff over the System.map and u-boot.map files is
> usually a good and easy test that images are identical.

Indeed -- my goal was to compare the build processes more than their 
products.

> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.