From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio Estevam Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:45:59 -0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] ARM: mx31pdk: Use the new relocation scheme In-Reply-To: <4D51AC9C.8040908@free.fr> References: <1294836544-24512-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com> <4D2F004B.9090204@denx.de> <4D309716.4000905@freescale.com> <4D4E8E11.2010906@gmail.com> <4D4FD850.3050800@freescale.com> <4D4FFE09.2090709@denx.de> <4D504CAA.7000302@gmail.com> <4D5178DA.4050401@freescale.com> <4D518280.3010300@denx.de> <4D5198EA.7020703@gmail.com> <4D51A52C.8080002@denx.de> <4D51AC9C.8040908@free.fr> Message-ID: <4D527E77.2060900@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Albert, On 2/8/2011 6:50 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 08/02/2011 21:18, stefano babic a ?crit : >> Am 08.02.2011 20:26, schrieb Magnus Lilja: >>> Patch reposted as a separate mail a couple of minutes ago. >>> >>> As I mention in the patch I think Fabio's patch has to be applied first. >> >> I think your patch is ok - Fabio fixed the syntax error as you do. We >> need only one of them. >> >>> Another solution would be to change my patch somewhat to apply it first >>> and then update Fabios patch to only touch the i.MX31-PDK specific >>> files. >> >> IMHO this is the preferred way, because the two issues are orthogonal. >> Your patch fixes booting from NAND for ARM11, and Fabio's patch fix the >> mx31pdk board only. > > Agreed. Ok, I have just submitted the patch series treating one issue at the time. > Note also that there was a recent patch to ARM926's start.S (replacing 'adr r1, _start' with 'ldr r1, _TEXT_BASE' at line 284). The same should be done on arm1136. Ok, I haven?t added this change to my patch series yet, but I can do it on a separate patch after my original patch series is applied, if this is OK with you. I have tested this recommended change and it worked fine on my mx31pdk board. Thanks, Fabio Estevam