From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Moore Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:16:16 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] Thunderbird bug (was PATCH-add "0X" hexadecimal prefix to simple_strtoul) In-Reply-To: <20110209151738.377f32b2@udp111988uds> References: <4D51716D.3060002@motorola.com> <20110208191447.BFECA14B9A35@gemini.denx.de> <4D523204.5040105@free.fr> <4D5236EC.2040703@free.fr> <20110209151738.377f32b2@udp111988uds> Message-ID: <4D5382B0.30708@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi, Le 09/02/2011 22:17, Scott Wood a ?crit : > On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:40:44 +0100 > Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >> Le 09/02/2011 07:19, Chris Moore a ?crit : >>> I also noticed this in some of my (rare) posts. >>> I am using TB 3.1.5. >>> I am too ashamed to admit my OS ;-) >>> >>> A nonsense test case written with correct spacing: a = (b> (c>> 1))&& >>> ((d< ((e& 1)<< 1))); >>> If you receive this correctly then please excuse me for the noise :( >> Received correctly. :) >> >> In Rob's case I am not sure that the issue is due to TB eating selected >> spaces upon reception; my own TB (3.1.7), using ^U to display the raw >> message from Rob, shows missing spaces are actually in what was sent, >> and I think Wolfgang does not use TB at all. > It's when quoting a message for a reply that Thunderbird does this mangling. > Right, that would seem to be this bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448198 I have certainly encountered this one when quoting :( But there is also: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597181 I wonder if I haven't run into this one too :( Cheers, Chris